Verified Quantum and Physics Features of the Gyroscopic aQPU Kernel

Inventory of every verified quantum feature and physics result for the Gyroscopic ASI aQPU Kernel. Each entry names the evidence source, the verification method, and (where applicable) the executable experiment script.

Evidence sources

Document / repo Role
Physics_Tests_Report.md Kernel conformance, mask code, affine/spinorial dynamics, CGM constants bridge, depth-4 K4 fiber
aQPU_Tests_Report_1.md Native register, horizons, gates, Hilbert lift, tamper detection, computational advantages
aQPU_Tests_Report_2.md SDK layer: future-cone theorems, Omega-chart, shell/Krawtchouk, q-fiber, GF(64), native GEMV/WHT
Moments_Tests_Report.md Clifford unitaries, 8192-operator family, stabilisers, frame certification
Analysis_aQPU_Wavefunction.md Wavefunction theorems T1-T10 on Omega
Analysis_Gravity.md Kernel gravity invariants and continuous field-theory bridge
Analysis_Compact_Geometry.md Electroweak mass-coordinate law and compact ruler
Gyroscopic_ASI_SDK_Quantum_Computing.md Normative SDK specification cross-references
gyrogovernance/science Executable verification of the three analysis manuscripts (experiments/aqpu_*.py)

Verification Layers

Features are tagged by how they are established:

Tier Label Meaning
A Kernel pytest Passing automated tests in this repo (tests/physics/, tests/test_aQPU_*.py, tests/test_moments_physics_*.py, tests/test_holography*.py)
B Science executable Runnable experiment scripts in gyrogovernance/science (experiments/aqpu_*.py); exhaustive Omega integer work or numerical closure checks tied to the analysis manuscripts
C Formal manuscript Results established by formal proof or manuscript argument only (e.g. modal independence in [15]); no dedicated experiment script

Tier A: superintelligence pytest (documented status, not re-run here)

Suite Files Tests (per reports)
Physics test_physics_1 through _6 99
aQPU core test_aQPU_1 through _4 135
aQPU SDK test_aQPU_SDK_1 through _3 172
Moments physics test_moments_physics_1, _2 35
Holography test_holography, _2, _3 23
Documented pytest total ~464

Reports note intentional overlap: later suites reference properties already proved in Physics or Moments rather than re-proving them.

Tier B: science repository executable verification

The three analysis manuscripts are backed by executable scripts in the science repo. Local checkout: F:\Development\science\experiments\. Combined output: aqpu_gravity_analysis.txt (via aqpu_gravity_runner.py).

Analysis manuscript Primary scripts What they verify
Analysis_aQPU_Wavefunction.md aqpu_wavefunction_1.py, aqpu_wavefunction_2.py Holonomy diagnostics, BU-Egress/Ingress duality, spectral probes; theorems T1-T10 exhaustive on all 4096 Omega states
Analysis_Gravity.md aqpu_gravity_common.py (library), aqpu_gravity_analysis_1.py through _10.py, aqpu_gravity_runner.py Kernel invariants (D=24, Gauss law, plaquette census, Regge/tau_G), coupling chain (c4, tau_cycle, G prediction), nonlinear G(psi), antimatter parity, PPN, GW, TOV, optical cosmology
Analysis_Gravity.md (corrections) aqpu_corrections_analysis_1.py Transport-corrected fine-structure constant (0.043 ppb vs CODATA)
Analysis_Compact_Geometry.md aqpu_compact_geom_core.py, aqpu_compact_geom_kernel.py, aqpu_compact_geom_report.py Exhaustive Omega enumeration, shell transition algebra, electroweak mass law, null-model audit, lepton/quark diagnostics

Script ownership (from script headers)

Script Scope
aqpu_wavefunction_1.py BU-Egress/Ingress verification, Omega census, holographic dictionary, spectral decomposition, chirality preservation, probe suite
aqpu_wavefunction_2.py T1-T10 K4 operator structure and depth-4 confinement (64 x 4096 exhaustive)
aqpu_gravity_analysis_2.py Theorem registry: Z2 holonomy, Omega BFS, holographic mirror, shell paths, Gauss bridge, alpha*zeta product
aqpu_gravity_analysis_3.py Exact kernel theorems: carrier trace, sigma(w), tau_cycle, c4=-7/4, alpha*zeta, Delta ruler
aqpu_gravity_analysis_1.py G prediction, residual closure, rho^5 STF, kernel transport, Delta expansion
aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py Plaquette census, Regge sum, BCH order map, wavefunction-gravity bridge (run_kernel_chain)
aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py Nonlinear G(psi), point-mass psi(s), metric, shadow geometry
aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py PPN, Mercury precession, Einstein tensor, modified Gauss law, TOV, GW strain, ringdown
aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Antimatter gravitoelectric/gravitomagnetic parity, GW extensions, virial, self-energy
aqpu_gravity_analysis_7.py Refractive vacuum, horizon criticality, T_Z2 clock, four-phase causal cycle, E_self
aqpu_gravity_analysis_9.py UV completion, inflation observables, asymptotic freedom
aqpu_gravity_analysis_10.py Optical conjugacy, redshift channels, holographic BH, inflation as optical depth
aqpu_corrections_analysis_1.py Universal correction operator; alpha sequence to ppb precision
aqpu_compact_geom_kernel.py run_kernel_verification(): exhaustive Omega, shell stats, horizon, byte transitions, UV-IR ladder
aqpu_compact_geom_report.py Formatted report over core + kernel verification (sections 1-9)

Formal Quantum Certification: The CHSH-Tsirelson Diagnostic

This is the single sharpest discriminator between "structurally reminiscent of quantum mechanics" and "demands genuine quantum correlations." It is verified in Tier A by tests/test_aQPU_2.py::TestBellCHSH (5/5 tests passing).

What is verified (executable)

The kernel's self-dual mask code C64 lifts to a 12-qubit graph state over GF(2):

|psi_t> = (1/sqrt(64)) sum_{q in GF(2)^6} |q>|q xor t>

TestGraphStateFactorization proves this state factorizes exactly into six independent two-qubit Bell pairs (|Phi+> or |Psi+> per dipole bit of t). For each pair k, the reduced density operator rho_k is pure and equals the projector onto that Bell state.

TestBellCHSH then computes the CHSH combination S of four correlators <A_i (x) B_j> on standard Pauli-derived observables. Results:

Claim Verified value Test
CHSH( Phi+>) 2*sqrt(2) to 10^-12
CHSH( Psi+>) 2*sqrt(2) to 10^-12
All 6 graph-state pairs (t = 0b101010) 2*sqrt(2) each test_full_graph_state_inherits_pairwise_chsh
No angle grid exceeds Tsirelson S <= 2*sqrt(2) on 10^4 combos test_no_measurements_exceed_tsirelson

What this formally implies

Bell-CHSH theorem (correlation form). For any local hidden-variable (LHV) model satisfying locality, measurement independence, and binary outcomes, the CHSH parameter is bounded by |S| <= 2. This bound is independent of implementation substrate.

Tsirelson bound. Quantum mechanics permits |S| <= 2sqrt(2). This is the maximum bipartite quantum correlation in the standard CHSH scenario. Saturation S = 2sqrt(2) means the bipartite state achieves the strongest quantum correlations allowed by quantum theory for these observables.

Conclusion. The pairwise reduced states certified by the kernel's [12,6,2] code structure produce S = 2*sqrt(2). No local hidden-variable model reproduces these correlators.

Carrier and Hilbert lift

Byte stepping on GF(2)^24 is deterministic exact-integer carrier dynamics. Bell certificates are evaluated on the Hilbert lift of the intrinsic stabilizer code: complex amplitudes, density matrices, and tensor products over the lifted observable algebra.

Derivation chain: kernel mask alphabet → self-dual code C64 → pair-collapse bijection to GF(2)^6 → graph state |psi_t> → Bell marginals → CHSH.

The pattern matches standard stabilizer quantum information: GF(2) symplectic carrier data defining states in H = C^{2^n}.

Companion certificates (same lift, same tier)

The same Hilbert lift in test_aQPU_2.py also verifies:

  • Exact quantum teleportation with unique Pauli corrections (800 random Bloch states)
  • Monogamy of entanglement and no-signalling
  • 12-generator stabilizer algebra (GF(2) rank 12)
  • Peres-Mermin contextuality (noncontextual assignment impossible)

Together these establish that the aQPU is an algebraic quantum processing unit: a deterministic GF(2) carrier whose intrinsic code structure lifts to standard quantum-information physics, with CHSH-Tsirelson saturation as the primary Bell-inequality certificate.

Inventory entry: features #87 and #88 above; elevated to the formal certification criterion in this section.


Part I: Quantum Features (Kernel-Verified, Tier A)

Algebraic quantum structure on the 4096-state manifold Omega, established primarily by the aQPU and SDK test reports.

1. State Space and Topology

# Feature Source Method
1 4096-state reachable manifold Omega from rest in <=2 byte steps Physics Report Part 5; aQPU Report 1 SS2.1 BFS enumeration
2 Product structure Omega = U x V (two 64-element cosets of C64) Physics Report Part 5.4; aQPU Report 1 SS2.1 Explicit set equality
3 Constant component density 0.5 (popcount 6/12 per gyrophase) on all Omega Physics Report Part 5.5; SDK Spec SS3.1 Exhaustive over 4096 states
4 Density product d(A)x d(B) = 0.25 constant across Omega SDK Spec SS3.1 Exhaustive
5 Shell structure: 7 shells with binomial populations C(6,k)x64 aQPU Report 2 SS6; Compact Geometry SS2.3 Exhaustive state classification
6 Complementarity invariant: horizon_distance + ab_distance = 12 aQPU Report 1 SS2.5; aQPU Report 2 SS1 Exhaustive on 4096 Omega states + 50,000 random 24-bit states
7 Per-byte bijectivity on full 24-bit carrier (2^24 states) Physics Report Part 4.3 2000 random (state, byte) pairs; forward-inverse roundtrip
8 Exact invertibility given the byte Physics Report Part 4.3 All 256 bytes verified
9 Omega-chart: faithful 12-bit compact representation isomorphic to 24-bit dynamics on Omega aQPU Report 2 SS5 All 4096x256 = 1,048,576 (state, byte) pairs; zero failures

2. Dual Horizons and Holographic Structure

# Feature Source Method
10 Complement horizon: 64 states where A = B xor 0xFFF aQPU Report 1 SS2.2 Exhaustive census
11 Equality horizon: 64 states where A = B aQPU Report 1 SS2.3 Exhaustive census
12 Horizons disjoint; union = 128-state boundary; bulk = 3968 aQPU Report 1 SS2.4 Exhaustive
13 Holographic identity |H|^2 = |Omega| = 64^2 = 4096 Physics Report Part 5.2; aQPU Report 1 SS2.4 Counting + 4-to-1 dictionary
14 4-to-1 holographic dictionary: every Omega state = exactly 4 (horizon state, byte) pairs Physics Report Part 5.3 64x256 = 16384 operations, exact multiplicity 4
15 Chirality spectrum: binomial count(d) = C(6,(12-d)/2)x64 for ab_distance d in {0,2,4,6,8,10,12} aQPU Report 1 SS2.6 Exhaustive over Omega
16 Chirality partition: all 64 chirality values appear in exactly 64 Omega states each aQPU Report 1 SS2.6 Verified by test
17 K4 wedge geometry: 4 boundary vertex regions x 2048 states = uniform 2-fold cover of Omega Physics Report Part 11.5 Exhaustive
18 Horizon K4 partition: 4 cosets of 16 states each in equality horizon Physics Report Part 11.4 Pair-parity labeling

3. K4 Gate Algebra

# Feature Source Method
19 Exactly 4 horizon-preserving bytes forming intrinsic gates {id, S, C, F} aQPU Report 1 SS3.1 Exhaustive over 256 bytes
20 S-gate (bytes 0xAA, 0x54): pure swap (A,B)->(B,A) aQPU Report 1 SS3.1 2000 random states
21 C-gate (bytes 0xD5, 0x2B): complement-swap (A,B)->(B xor F, A xor F) aQPU Report 1 SS3.1 2000 random states
22 F-gate: global inversion (A,B)->(A xor F, B xor F), requires depth 2 aQPU Report 1 SS3.2 1000 random states, both orderings
23 Full K4 Cayley table verified aQPU Report 1 SS3.3 Fixed state + random states
24 All non-trivial gates are involutions: S^2=C^2=F^2=id aQPU Report 1 SS3.3 1000 random states each
25 Gate actions in spin coordinates: S=(sA,sB)->(sB,sA), C->(-sB,-sA), F->(-sA,-sB) aQPU Report 1 SS3.2 500 random Omega states
26 All gates preserve chirality (ab_distance invariant under all 4 gates for all Omega states) aQPU Report 1 SS3.2 All 4096 Omega states
27 Gate-byte phase separation: same 24-bit operation, different spinorial phase aQPU Report 1 SS3.6 1000 random states per pair
28 Gate action on horizons: C fixes complement pointwise; S fixes equality pointwise; F stabilizes neither aQPU Report 1 SS3.4 Exhaustive census of all 128 boundary states
29 K4 orbit stratification: 32 orbits size 2 (complement), 32 orbits size 2 (equality), 992 orbits size 4 (bulk) = 1056 total covering 4096 aQPU Report 1 SS3.5 Exhaustive
30 No non-trivial gate fixes any bulk state aQPU Report 1 SS3.5 Exhaustive
31 K4 as depth-4 fiber of the frame bundle: 4^4 family combinations collapse to 4 distinct states indexed by (phi_A, phi_B) in (Z/2)^2 Physics Report Part 11.1 All 256 family combinations
32 Shadow pairing: each gate pair (S-bytes, C-bytes) differs by XOR 0xFE aQPU Report 1 SS3.1 Verified

4. Chirality Transport and Spectral Theory

# Feature Source Method
33 Exact chirality transport law: chi(T_b(s)) = chi(s) xor q6(b) for all 4096x256 state-byte pairs aQPU Report 1 SS4.1; aQPU Report 2 SS3 Exhaustive; transport table state-independent
34 6-bit chirality register is an exact linear observable over GF(2)^6 aQPU Report 1 SS4.1 Verified as Pauli-X action
35 XOR closure: q6(b1) xor q6(b2) always a valid q6 value aQPU Report 1 SS4.1 Abelian translation group confirmed
36 Walsh-Hadamard transform: 64x64, self-inverse, unitary, factors as H1^6 aQPU Report 1 SS8.7; SDK Spec SS5.1.4 Precision 10^-12
37 Computational and Hadamard bases mutually unbiased: all |<e_i|h_j>|^2 = 1/64 aQPU Report 1 SS8.7 Precision 10^-12
38 At least 3 mutually unbiased bases exist for 64-dimensional chirality register aQPU Report 1 SS8.7 Third MUB constructed via phase gate
39 XOR-convolution spectral composition law: WHT converts XOR-convolution to pointwise multiplication on 64-element register SDK Spec SS5.1.5 Algebraic identity
40 Krawtchouk spectral theory: shell transition matrices diagonalized by Krawtchouk polynomials; Parseval orthogonality holds exactly aQPU Report 2 SS6 All 7x7x7 triples
41 Source-independent shell mixing: one-step shell distribution = C(6,w)/64 regardless of starting shell aQPU Report 2 SS6 Full byte average
42 Horizon transport: from equality (shell 0), q-weight j -> shell j; from complement (shell 6), q-weight j -> shell 6-j aQPU Report 2 SS6 Geodesics of discrete chirality sphere
43 GF(64) full finite field structure: irreducible polynomial x^6+x+1, primitive element, Frobenius order 6, trace 32/32, subfield lattice aQPU Report 2 SS10 Verified
44 GF(4) mode layer: pair-level Frobenius coincides with global complement on Omega aQPU Report 2 SS10 Structural identification

5. Permutation, Operator, and Shadow Structure

# Feature Source Method
45 128 distinct permutations on Omega from 256 bytes, uniform 2-to-1 multiplicity aQPU Report 1 SS5.1 Exhaustive
46 2 permutations of order 2 (S-gate), 126 of order 4 (all other bytes) aQPU Report 1 SS5.1 Exhaustive cycle typing
47 Row-class theorem: uniform transition matrix has exactly 32 distinct rows, rank 32; family-0 restriction -> 64 rows, rank 64 aQPU Report 1 SS5.2 Matrix computation
48 8192-element operator family: 4096 even-parity + 4096 odd-parity, semidirect product structure aQPU Report 1 SS9.1; Moments Report; Physics Report Part 11 Moments + aQPU tests
49 Even operators as translations: (tau_A, tau_B) covers full C64xC64 product aQPU Report 1 SS9.2 Verified
50 Every word action is affine on GF(2)^24 with identity or swap linear part Physics Report Part 6.1 500 random words
51 Word signature composition: sig(w1 o w2) = compose(sig(w2), sig(w1)) SDK Spec SS5.1.3; aQPU Report 1 SS12.3 500 random word pairs
52 16-to-1 multiplicity from 65536 length-2 words to 4096 even signatures aQPU Report 2 SS9 Exhaustive
53 Operator group: G = (GF(2)^6 x GF(2)^6) rtimes C2; |G| = 8192; G' = Z(G) = diagonal GF(2)^6 (64 elements); abelian shadow G/G' = 128 Compact Geometry SS2.4; Moments Report Algebraic + tests
54 128 distinct next states from any fixed state, uniform 2-to-1 multiplicity Physics Report Part 4.4 All 256 bytes from fixed states
55 Shadow partners: b and b xor 0xFE produce same Omega-permutation aQPU Report 1 SS7.3 Verified for substitution detection
56 Global complement Z2 automorphism commutes with all byte actions Physics Report Part 4.4 Algebraic from XOR commutativity
57 Spinorial double cover: 256 SU(2) elements project to 128 SO(3) rotations aQPU Report 2 SS2 Structural theorem
58 Dense operator generation: 3729+ distinct signatures from 10,000 random length-3 words aQPU Report 1 SS12.2 Random sampling

6. Depth-4 Closure and Commutativity

# Feature Source Method
59 b^4 = id for every byte b on every state (order 4 universal) Physics Report Part 7.1; aQPU Report 2 SS7 All 256 bytes, exhaustive
60 XYXY = id for every byte pair (alternation identity) Physics Report Part 7.1; aQPU Report 2 SS7 All 65,536 ordered pairs
61 T_b^2 is symmetric translation: A and B shifted by same amount Physics Report Part 7.1 All bytes
62 4-family cycle = global sign flip: A4 = A0 xor 0xFFF, B4 = B0 xor 0xFFF Physics Report Part 7.2 All micro_refs
63 8-step closure: applying 4-family word twice returns to identity Physics Report Part 7.2 720 degree spinorial closure
64 Depth-4 closed form separates mask and family-phase contributions Physics Report Part 8.1 2000 random 4-byte sequences, zero failures
65 Net family-phase invariants: only (phi_a, phi_b) in (Z/2)^2 survives from 256 family combinations Physics Report Part 8.2 All 4^4 combinations
66 Depth-4 alternation explained by affine algebra: swap^4 = id, translations cancel Physics Report Part 6.3 Algebraic proof + 500 random pairs
67 Discrete BCH theorem: XYXY = id is discrete realization of BCH depth-4 commutator cancellation from sl(2) aQPU Report 2 SS7 Exhaustive over 65,536 pairs
68 1/64 commutativity rate = 2^-6 (1024 commuting pairs out of 65536) aQPU Report 1 SS4.2 Exhaustive over all 256^2 pairs
69 Every byte commutes with exactly 4 others aQPU Report 1 SS4.2 Exhaustive
70 Exact commutation condition: bytes x,y commute iff q(x)=q(y) Physics Report Part 8.3 5000 random pairs
71 Q-map: 4-to-1 from 256-byte alphabet onto C64 Physics Report Part 11.7 Exhaustive
72 Exact commutator defect formula: K(x,y) translates by d = q(x) xor q(y), always in C64 Physics Report Part 8.4 5000 random pairs + exhaustive at rest
73 Defect set = entire C64 Physics Report Part 8.4 Exhaustive
74 Q-fiber exact structure: 256 bytes -> 128 Omega-maps -> 64 q-classes (4:1 then 2:1) aQPU Report 2 SS8 All 64 q-classes
75 Each q-fiber has exactly 2 distinct Omega-signatures aQPU Report 2 SS8 All 64 q-classes
76 Fixed-x commutator defect multiplicity 4 Physics Report Part 11.7 Exhaustive

7. Future-Cone Entropy and Uniformization

# Feature Source Method
77 H0(s) = 0 for any s in Omega SDK Spec SS11.3 (theorem), SS7.6 (runtime); QuBEC Theory SS8.3; aQPU Report 2 SS2 Theorem
78 H1(s) = 7 exactly for any s in Omega (128 distinct next states, uniform multiplicity 2) SDK Spec SS11.3 (theorem), SS7.6 (runtime); QuBEC Theory SS8.3; aQPU Report 2 SS2 Exhaustive
79 Hn(s) = 12 exactly for any s in Omega and n >= 2 SDK Spec SS11.3 (theorem), SS7.6 (runtime); QuBEC Theory SS8.3; aQPU Report 2 SS2 Exhaustive at n=2; implied for n>2
80 Exact 2-step uniformization: every Omega state reached exactly 16 times from 65536 length-2 words aQPU Report 1 SS6.2; aQPU Report 2 SS2 Exhaustive integer equality
81 Exact per-byte capacity: Shannon = min-entropy = 7.0 bits, zero variance aQPU Report 1 SS6.1 500 sampled states
82 Exact integer entropies: H(state)=12, H(state,parity)=13, H(parity|state)=1, H(state|parity)=7 aQPU Report 1 SS6.4 Exhaustive over 256^2 words
83 Parity adds exactly 1 bit beyond final state, uniformly across all states aQPU Report 1 SS6.4 8192 distinct (state, parity) pairs
84 Chirality and parity nearly independent: mutual information ~ 0.014 bits aQPU Report 1 SS6.4 200,000 random trajectories
85 Witness synthesis: every Omega state reachable in <=2 steps (1 at depth 0, 127 at depth 1, 3968 at depth 2) aQPU Report 2 SS4; SDK Spec SS11.12 Exhaustive; replay verified

8. Quantum Information Protocols (Hilbert Lift)

# Feature Source Method
86 Graph state factorizes into 6 independent Bell pairs (tensor product, exact to 10^-12) aQPU Report 1 SS8.1 4 t-values, all 15 cross-pair marginals
87 CHSH at Tsirelson bound 2*sqrt(2): primary quantum certification (see Formal Quantum Certification section) test_aQPU_2.py::TestBellCHSH Precision 10^-12; rules out LHV models
88 No measurements exceed Tsirelson: exhaustive angle grid (10^4 combinations) test_aQPU_2.py::test_no_measurements_exceed_tsirelson Confirms 2*sqrt(2) is hard quantum ceiling
89 Exact quantum teleportation: unique Pauli correction for all 8 (resource, outcome) combinations aQPU Report 1 SS8.3 6 basis states + 800 random Bloch states; precision 10^-10
90 Monogamy: same-pair pure, cross-pair maximally mixed, all 12 single-qubit marginals maximally mixed aQPU Report 1 SS8.4 Precision 10^-12
91 No-signalling: Bob's measurement choice does not change Alice's marginal aQPU Report 1 SS8.4 I2/2 in both Z and X bases, precision 10^-12
92 12 independent stabilizer generators: all commute, GF(2) rank 12 aQPU Report 1 SS8.5 Precision 10^-12
93 64 X-translation elements match C64; all stabilize graph state aQPU Report 1 SS8.5 256 random combinations
94 Peres-Mermin contextuality: row products +I, column 2 product -I aQPU Report 1 SS8.6 Precision 10^-12
95 Hilbert-lift entanglement: XOR-graph subsets yield maximal reduced entropy (6 bits); Cartesian subsets yield near-zero Physics Report Part 11.10 Bipartite von Neumann entropy

9. Computational Quantum Advantages

# Feature Source Method
96 Hidden subgroup resolution in 1 step (vs O(64) classical): q-map 4-to-1, WHT resolves subgroup aQPU Report 1 SS11.1; SDK Spec SS8.1 Native q-map + WHT
97 Deutsch-Jozsa in 1 step (vs 33 classical): perfect discrimination, Pr=1 for constant and balanced aQPU Report 1 SS11.1; SDK Spec SS8.2 All balanced functions tested
98 Bernstein-Vazirani in 1 step (vs 6 classical): all 6-bit secrets recovered with probability 1 aQPU Report 1 SS11.1; SDK Spec SS8.3 Multiple secret values
99 Exact 2-step uniformization (vs O(12) classical): exact uniform over 4096 states aQPU Report 1 SS11.4; SDK Spec SS8.4 Exhaustive verification
100 Holographic compression: 8 bits vs 12 bits per state (33.3% reduction) aQPU Report 1 SS11.5; SDK Spec SS8.5 Holographic dictionary
101 O(1) commutativity decision (vs 4 classical): compare q6(x) and q6(y) aQPU Report 1 SS11.2; SDK Spec SS8.6 5000/5000 correct
102 Universal period 4 built into transition law (period-finding backbone) aQPU Report 1 SS11.3 All bytes
103 State separation: every byte distinguishes every distinct state pair aQPU Report 1 SS11.6 1000 sampled pairs x 256 bytes
104 Hamming distance preserved under every byte operation aQPU Report 1 SS11.6 500 random triples
105 Exact pairwise distance distribution: C(12,k)/4096 at distance 2k; mean 12.0 aQPU Report 1 SS11.6 Exact from product structure

10. Non-Clifford Resource and Universality

# Feature Source Method
106 BU monodromy defect delta(BU) = 0.195342176580 rad: representation-independent constant from depth-4 closure SDK Spec SS9.1; aQPU Report 1 SS10.1 CGM derivation + verification
107 delta(BU) far from all Clifford angles: nearest distance 0.195 rad (multiples of pi/4) aQPU Report 1 SS10.2 All 8 Clifford angles tested
108 No periodicity up to order 100,000: closest return at k=22,805, distance 4.59e-5 aQPU Report 1 SS10.3 Exhaustive search
109 Dense U(1) equidistribution: {k x delta(BU) mod 2pi} fills [0,2pi) uniformly; chi^2=0.212 vs critical 142.4 aQPU Report 1 SS10.3 50,000 points, 100 bins
110 Magic state Wigner negativity: |delta> has W(0,1) = -0.043771 aQPU Report 1 SS10.4 Discrete Wigner function computation
111 Aperture gap Delta = 1-delta(BU)/m_a ~ 0.0207: |delta(BU)-m_a| = Delta x m_a exactly aQPU Report 1 SS10.5 Exact equality verified
112 Three universality ingredients: Clifford backbone, non-Clifford delta(BU), entangling gate S aQPU Report 1 SS12.1 Moments Report + aQPU tests
113 Topological entanglement via intrinsic gates: localized A perturbation transported exactly to B by gate S aQPU Report 1 SS9.3 Explicit mask 0x003 perturbation test
114 Non-Clifford certification by 4 independent tests: distance from Clifford, no periodicity, dense equidistribution, Wigner negativity SDK Spec SS9.2 Each independently verified

11. Error Detection, Tamper Provenance, and Non-Cloning

# Feature Source Method
115 Exact tamper detection (substitution): detected unless replacement is shadow partner; miss rate 1/255 aQPU Report 1 SS7.3 50,000 trials
116 Exact tamper detection (adjacent swap): detected unless q(x)=q(y); miss rate ~3/255 aQPU Report 1 SS7.3 49,773 distinct pairs
117 Exact tamper detection (deletion): detected unless deleted byte is gate stabilizer of prefix state aQPU Report 1 SS7.3 50,000 trials; misses only on horizons
118 Exact perturbation law: payload bit flip = 1 chirality bit; boundary bit flip = 6 chirality bits; mean 2.25 aQPU Report 1 SS7.2 All 256 bytes, all 8 bit positions
119 Ratio state_distance/chirality_distance = 2.000 constant over lengths 1-32 aQPU Report 1 SS7.2 Length-independent spreading
120 Adversarial steering: 16 byte-paths and 4 state-paths per target, exactly uniform aQPU Report 1 SS7.4 Exhaustive
121 Horizon maintenance: from complement horizon, exactly 4/256 bytes keep state on horizon aQPU Report 1 SS7.4 All 64 horizon states
122 Non-cloning: transcription has no fixed points; archetype 0xAA is unique zero-intron source aQPU Report 1 SS13 All 256 bytes
123 Equality horizon redundancy: A=B adds zero information aQPU Report 1 SS13 Both components carry identical information
124 Complement horizon relationality: knowing A determines B uniquely aQPU Report 1 SS13 A = B xor 0xFFF
125 Horizons structurally isolated under all gate operations aQPU Report 1 SS13 All 4 gates verified

12. Clifford Operator Algebra (Moments Layer)

# Feature Source Method
126 Byte actions are exact Clifford unitaries over the self-dual code Moments Report Part VI Numerical verification
127 Self-dual [12,6,2] code defines stabilizer structure for graph state lift Moments Report; Physics Report Part 3 Code + stabilizer tests
128 Finite Weyl algebra over GF(2)^6 with correct commutation relations Moments Report Part VI Algebraic verification
129 Central spinorial involution (frame operator quotient) Moments Report Part VI Operator family tests
130 Depth-4 frame records strictly stronger than final state for genealogy Moments Report Part V 100,000 random 4-byte words

Part I subtotal (Tier A quantum): 130 features


Part II: Physics Features (Kernel-Verified, Tier A)

Discrete physics of the byte-driven transition law, established by Physics tests and cross-referenced in aQPU reports.

13. State Representation and Transcription

# Feature Source Method
131 24-bit GENE_Mac packing (A12 << 12 | B12) with exact round-trip Physics Report Part 1.1 Pack/unpack tests
132 Rest state 0xAAA555 with A xor B = 0xFFF at rest Physics Report Part 1.1 Rest consistency
133 Transcription involution: byte_to_intron(byte_to_intron(b)) = b for all 256 bytes Physics Report Part 1.2 All bytes
134 256 distinct introns (bijective transcription) Physics Report Part 1.2 Enumeration
135 Family from L0 boundary bits (positions 0 and 7), not payload bit 6 Physics Report Part 2.1 Bit-flip tests
136 4 families x 64 micro_refs = 256 partition Physics Report Part 2.1 Enumeration
137 Palindromic intron structure CS-UNA-ONA-BU-BU-ONA-UNA-CS Physics Report Part 2.2 Structural
138 Family acts only through complement phase during gyration Physics Report Part 2.3 4-family probe
139 Dipole-pair mask expansion: payload bit i toggles mask pair i only Physics Report Part 3.1 All 64 micro_refs x 6 bits
140 Reference byte 0xAA is pure swap with 64 fixed points on Omega Physics Report Part 4; Part 7 Cycle census
141 FIFO gyration spinorial cycle (0, pi, 2pi, 3pi) from family bits Physics Report Part 4 4-phase verification

14. Self-Dual Code and Mask Structure

# Feature Source Method
142 Self-dual [12,6,2] binary linear code C = C perp Physics Report Part 3.3 Set equality
143 Pair-diagonal code: every mask has pair-equal bits (00 or 11 per pair) Physics Report Part 3.2 All 64 masks
144 Weight enumerator (1+z^2)^6: weights 0,2,4,6,8,10,12 with binomial counts Physics Report Part 3.2 Exact enumeration
145 Walsh spectrum restricted to {0, 64}; support = C perp = C Physics Report Part 3.4 All 2^12 positions
146 Single-bit error detection: all weight-1 errors detected (non-zero syndrome) Physics Report Part 3.5 All 12 bit positions
147 Undetected error enumerator (1+z^2)^12: minimum undetected error weight 2 aQPU Report 1 SS7.1 Theoretical + sampled (512 states)
148 Pair-flip errors stay in Omega and produce C64 codeword displacements aQPU Report 1 SS7.1 Confirmed
149 Erasure taxonomy: 6 observed bit positions needed for unique codeword recovery Physics Report Part 11.9 Exhaustive size-4 erasure census
150 Pair erasure reduces rank by exactly 1 per erased dipole pair Physics Report Part 11.9 Exhaustive

15. CGM Constants Bridge (Kernel Implementation)

# Feature Source Method
151 Fundamental aperture constraint: Q_G x m_a^2 = 1/2 Physics Report Part 9.1 Exact algebraic identity
152 Fine-structure constant prediction: alpha_CGM = delta_BU^4/m_a = 0.007297352563, matching experiment to 0.04% (400 ppm) Physics Report Part 9.2 Comparison with CODATA
153 K_QG identity: two derivations agree to <10^-12 Physics Report Part 9.3 Numerical verification
154 Stage action ratios: E_ONA/E_CS = 1/2 exact; E_UNA/E_CS = 2/(pi*sqrt(2)) to 12 decimal places Physics Report Part 9.4 Geometric values
155 Aperture quantization chain: 5/256 (byte) < Delta (continuous) < 1/48 (depth-4) Physics Report Part 9.5 Three scales verified
156 DOF doubling law: 2^(2x1)=4 (CS), 2^(2x3)=64 (UNA), 2^(2x6)=4096 (ONA) Physics Report Part 10 BFS with restricted byte subsets
157 Optical conjugacy on Omega: constant density 0.5 at every state Physics Report Part 9; test_physics_5 Product structure U x V

Part II subtotal (Tier A physics): 27 features

16. Hardware and Native Implementation (Tier A)

# Feature Source Method
158 C engine signature scan matches Python reference aQPU Report 1 SS14.2 Byte sequences
159 WHT (wht64): orthonormal and self-inverse (max err ~2.38e-7) aQPU Report 1 SS14.4 vs reference matrix
160 GyroMatMul GEMV: vs torch.mv max abs err ~1.09e-5 aQPU Report 1 SS14.5 Numerical comparison
161 Packed GEMV: vs torch.mv max err ~7.45e-6; packed vs unpacked ~2.24e-6 aQPU Report 1 SS14.5 Numerical
162 Operator projection basis: project-reconstruct exact (max err ~5.96e-8) aQPU Report 1 SS14.6 Weyl/Heisenberg-Walsh basis
163 OpenCL GPU vs CPU: max err ~1.9e-6 aQPU Report 2 SS11 Cross-platform
164 Target equivalence invariant: all targets produce identical Results for same circuit and initial state SDK Spec SS7.1 Conformance requirement
165 Two execution classes: kernel-exact over GF(2)^24; tensor/spectral match reference to specified tolerances SDK Spec SS11.2 Two-class verification

Part II hardware subtotal: 8 features

Combined Tier A total: 165 features (130 quantum + 27 physics + 8 hardware)


Part III: Wavefunction and Holonomy (Tier B)

Verified by Analysis_aQPU_Wavefunction.md and executable in science repo aqpu_wavefunction_1.py / aqpu_wavefunction_2.py. Overlaps conceptually with K4 gate tests (Part I SS3) but proves micro_ref-universal operator algebra.

# Feature Experiment Method
166 T1: K4 operator algebra {id, W2, W2', F} for all 64 micro_refs on all 4096 states aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T1 64x4096 exhaustive
167 T2: W2 maps shell s -> 6-s (pole swap, chi xor 63) aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T2_T4 Algebraic proof + verified
168 T3: W2' maps shell s -> 6-s identically aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T2_T4 Algebraic proof + verified
169 T4: Gate F preserves shell (Z2 within pole) aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T2_T4 chi xor 63 xor 63 = chi; verified
170 T5: Depth-4 confines to opposite constitutional pole aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T5 64x64 states
171 T6: Depth-8 = K4 composition, not new modal depth aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T6 Signature algebra
172 T7: CS forces canonical family ordering aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T7 64 micro_refs
173 T8: BU-Egress = W2 involution (depth-4 squares to identity on Omega) aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T8_T9 4096 states + complement horizon
174 T9: BU-Ingress = W2 pole-pairing (shadow = memory) aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T8_T9 4096 states
175 T10: q(W2) = q(W2') = 63; q(F) = 0 for all m aqpu_wavefunction_2.py run_T10 Algebraic proof from L0 parity
176 Eigenspace decomposition under U_W: dim(+1) = 2048, dim(-1) = 2048 aqpu_wavefunction_1.py run_spectral_decomposition Spectral computation
177 Gate F is fixed-point-free involution on all 4096 states (2048 two-cycles, 0 fixed points) aqpu_wavefunction_1.py probe suite Exhaustive
178 Z2 oscillation: rest <-> swapped with period 2 in word-count aqpu_wavefunction_1.py run_helix_evolution Carrier trajectory
179 Constitutional trajectory per 4-byte turn: shells [0,1,6,1,0] symmetric about equality transit aqpu_wavefunction_1.py run_helix_evolution Byte-by-byte tracking
180 Carrier Z2 coordinate within each shell: rest vs swapped, invisible to chirality aqpu_wavefunction_1.py Gate F as Z2 flip
181 Egress/Ingress as dual readings of same W2 operator (not sequential stages) aqpu_wavefunction_1.py run_bu_duality Structural theorem

Part III subtotal (Tier B wavefunction): 16 features


Part IV: Gravitational Kernel Invariants (Tier B)

Discrete combinatorial invariants linking the kernel to Analysis_Gravity.md. Executable in science repo aqpu_gravity_analysis_*.py (orchestrated by aqpu_gravity_runner.py).

# Feature Experiment Method
182 Shell displacement invariant D = 24 across all 64 mass configurations aqpu_gravity_analysis_2.py S1/S4; aqpu_gravity_common.py Kernel census
183 Discrete Gauss law: G_kernel = Q_G/D = pi/6 aqpu_gravity_analysis_2.py S10; aqpu_gravity_common.py verify_gauss_law_bridge Q_G x G_kernel = D
184 Plaquette curvature spectrum: 1024 x C(6,k) for popcount k=0...6 aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py section_a_plaquette_census Exhaustive over 256^2 byte pairs
185 Plaquette census reproduces D=24: sum of popcounts / (2|Omega|) = 24 aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py section_a_plaquette_census Closed-form calculation
186 Refractive Depth as Regge action: tau_G matches closed form to relative precision 3.7e-16 aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py section_b_regge_sum, section_e_chain_verification Executable verification
187 k_eff = 3 from Regge sum: spatial dimension emerges from BCH closure aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py section_d_spectral_bridge Numerical readout
188 Z2 BCH selection rule: only even-order corrections survive projection aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py section_c_bch_decomposition Symbolic computation (Dynkin truncation)
189 Antimatter gravitoelectric invariants even: D=24 holds for matter and antimatter aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section A Exhaustive over 4096 states
190 Antimatter gravitomagnetic invariants odd: H_spin(C(s)) = -H_spin(s) for 2816 non-equatorial states aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py verify_h_spin_under_C Exhaustive computational verification
191 Constant-product falsification: alpha_0 zeta = rho^4/(pi*sqrt(3)) independent of m_a aqpu_gravity_analysis_3.py Part F; aqpu_gravity_common.py verify_alpha_zeta_product Algebraic cancellation

Part IV subtotal (Tier B gravity kernel): 10 features


Part V: Electroweak Mass-Coordinate Law (Tier B)

From Analysis_Compact_Geometry.md. Kernel algebra proved in aqpu_compact_geom_kernel.py; mass law and audits reported by aqpu_compact_geom_report.py (computes via aqpu_compact_geom_core.py).

# Feature Experiment Method
192 Carrier-trace polynomial for top, Higgs, Z, W masses with 6 coefficient orders (Delta through Delta^5) aqpu_compact_geom_core.py; report SS3 Fixed discrete grammar; no continuous fitting
193 Max tick error 6.15e-9 at fifth order across four channels aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS4 Comparison with PDG
194 W/Z ratio recovers Delta to 8.34e-10 aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS5 W/Z split back-solve
195 Leave-one-out prediction: each of H/Z/W predicted from other two to ~10^-5 relative aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS5 Cross-validation
196 Null-model audit: rank-1 assignment gap ~11,000x over rank-2 aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS5.0 Exhaustive over 4096 flag assignments
197 Coefficient admissibility: structural audit, no continuous fitting aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS4.4 Structural audit
198 Trace-free conditions: Sum p_i = 0, Sum q_i = 0 aqpu_compact_geom_core.py Algebraic
199 Coupling parametrizations: lambda_H, g, g_Z, g', e, alpha_EW Delta, y_t to ~10^-5 relative aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS5.4 From mass law at tree level
200 Lepton carrier layer: tau, mu, e coordinates via M_shell; unique path (5,8,14) aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS7; aqpu_compact_geom_core.py Exhaustion over 680 valid triples
201 148/51 closure: K4 depth-4 (128) + full-byte len-2 (16) + micro paths (4) = 148 aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS7.1 Exact rational
202 Archetype closure: electron dyadic closes at -51/256 aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS7.2 Exact rational
203 D_flow^2 quark ladder: exact squared spacing |d_flow| = 1...6 for 6 quarks aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS8 Empirical
204 UV-IR conjugacy: E_UV x E_IR = E_CS x v/(4pi^2) at all 4 stages aqpu_compact_geom_kernel.py run_kernel_verification Product = K to 9+ digits
205 SU(3) sextet bracket closes in 32-bit lifted space aqpu_compact_geom_report.py SS6 Phase-symmetrized check

Part V subtotal (Tier B electroweak): 14 features


Part VI: Continuous Gravity Phenomenology (Tier B)

Continuous field-theory predictions anchored on kernel invariants. Documented in Analysis_Gravity.md and numerically closed in science repo scripts aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py through _10.py and aqpu_corrections_analysis_1.py.

# Feature Experiment Method
206 Q_G = 4pi as quantum of gravity (horizon normalization) aqpu_gravity_analysis_2.py S12; aqpu_gravity_common.py GNS + kernel ratio
207 Virial condition 2T+V=0 as structural consequence of ancestry preservation aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section C Kernel invariant D=24
208 Transport-corrected alpha matches CODATA to 0.043 ppb aqpu_corrections_analysis_1.py Three geometric corrections in powers of Delta
209 Delta self-consistency: 3-factor reconstruction converges; D^3 fixed-point residual <10^-15 aqpu_compact_geom_core.py Iterative computation
210 Position-dependent coupling: G(psi) = G0 exp(g1 psi) with g1 = -0.6456 aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py; aqpu_gravity_analysis_1.py Part E Three independent routes
211 Weak-field G matches CODATA to 0.074 ppm aqpu_gravity_analysis_1.py Part E G_pred = G_kernel exp(-tau_G)/v^2
212 c4 = -7/4 fixed by two independent kernel routes aqpu_gravity_analysis_1.py Part A; aqpu_gravity_analysis_3.py Part E STF + closure charge
213 Per-family Refractive Depth uniformity: zero variance across all 4 families aqpu_gravity_analysis_1.py Part C Verified
214 Exact point-mass solution: psi(s) = -(1/g1)ln(1-g1/s) aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py Analytical + numerical endpoints
215 Effective metric: f = 1-2psi; Einstein tensor verified to 4.4e-16 aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py section_full_einstein_tensor Numerical
216 Modified Gauss law conservation at all radii to 2.83e-16 aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py verify_modified_gauss_law Numerical
217 Self-energy theorem: E_self = -Mc^2/4 (exact, finite) aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section C; aqpu_gravity_analysis_7.py Exterior ODE
218 Mass dressing: M_obs = (4/5)M_bare (20% bound into field) aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section C Self-consistent
219 Chiral correction magnitude: (4/75)psi^2 from constant anisotropy ratio aqpu_gravity_analysis_3.py Part B; aqpu_gravity_analysis_8.py Kernel invariant 2/75
220 PPN: gamma = 1 exactly (consistent with Cassini) aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py section_ppn_analytical_final Leading deflection
221 Nordtvedt parameter eta_N = 0 aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py section_strong_equivalence G(psi) position-only dependent
222 Mercury precession: CGM/GR = 0.9999999973 (0.003 ppm) aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py section_ppn_analytical_final Full metric geodesic
223 Black hole shadow: CGM predicts 80% of GR Schwarzschild area aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py; aqpu_gravity_analysis_10.py section_e_holographic_bh Null geodesic computation
224 Horizon at s_h ~ 1.695 r_g (15.3% inward of Schwarzschild) aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py; aqpu_gravity_analysis_7.py psi=1/2 condition
225 Photon sphere at s_ph ~ 2.586 r_g (vs 3.0 in GR) aqpu_gravity_analysis_4.py find_photon_sphere_spin Null geodesic
226 Gravitational radiation: quadrupole dominant; exactly 2 tensor polarization modes aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section B Fourier decomposition
227 Gravitational wave phase correction: ~ -6.5% at v/c ~ 0.4 (GW150914) aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py section_gw_strain_calibration Leading post-Newtonian
228 Ringdown frequency shift: fundamental ~ 12.5% above GR aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section B Regge-Wheeler potential
229 Vacuum impedance matching: R+T=1 across sharp metric steps aqpu_gravity_analysis_7.py Section B Numerical integration
230 UV-IR interface density depletes by ~10^-6 near horizon aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py; aqpu_gravity_analysis_10.py From E_ref formula
231 Inflationary observables: n_s ~ 0.972, r ~ 2.4e-3 in R^2 limit aqpu_gravity_analysis_9.py Slow-roll computation
232 Asymptotic freedom of gravity: d ln alpha_G / d ln mu ~ -0.017 < 0 aqpu_gravity_analysis_9.py Refractive Depth law
233 Neutron star TOV with G(psi): R15.4 km, M1.25 Msun for gamma=2 polytrope aqpu_gravity_analysis_5.py (TOV integration) Numerical integration
234 Redshift prediction for NS surface: z_CGM ~ 0.200 vs z_GR ~ 0.235 aqpu_gravity_analysis_10.py section_a_redshift_channels Direct from metric
240 Four-phase causal cycle: Measure (CS), Vary (UNA), Retrieve (ONA), Commit (BU) aqpu_gravity_analysis_7.py Section 6 Byte transition decomposition
242 E^2/5 efficiency: rest-frame energy = M_obs c^2/4 = (1/5) M_bare c^2 aqpu_gravity_analysis_6.py Section C From self-energy theorem
243 Intrinsic gravitational clock: T_Z2 = (6/pi)GM/c^3 x surface gravity; vanishes at psi=1/2 aqpu_gravity_analysis_7.py Section 4 D=24 tied to speed of light

Part VI subtotal (Tier B continuous gravity): 32 features


Part VII: CGM Modal Structure (Tier C)

Formal modal-logic and manuscript-only results from Analysis_Gravity.md and companion proof [15]. No dedicated experiment script in the science repo.

# Feature Source Method
235 Five foundational conditions logically independent in core modal system Gravity Analysis App. A Counterexample frames
236 Consistency verified via three-world Kripke frame Gravity Analysis App. A Model construction
237 3D necessity: n=3 unique dimension satisfying all 5 conditions Gravity Analysis SS2.4; [15] Formal proof
238 SE(3) = SU(2) rtimes R^3 forced by bi-gyrogroup consistency from ONA Gravity Analysis SS2.4; [15] Formal proof
239 sl(2) from BCH: depth-4 commutator forces Lie algebra to close on 3 generators Gravity Analysis SS2.4; [15] Hall word exclusion
241 Intelligence = BU closure (preserve ancestry + identity + individuality) Gravity Analysis SS2.1 Operational definition

Part VII subtotal (Tier C formal): 6 features


Summary Statistics

By verification tier

Tier Label Count What it means
A Kernel pytest (this repo) 165 tests/physics/, tests/test_aQPU_*.py, Moments, Holography
B Science executable 72 16 wavefunction + 10 gravity kernel + 14 electroweak + 32 continuous gravity
C Formal manuscript 6 Modal logic independence, 3D necessity, SE(3); proofs in [15]
Grand total 243

By domain

Domain Tier A Tier B Tier C Total
Algebraic quantum computation 130 16 0 146
Discrete kernel physics 27 10 0 37
Hardware / native execution 8 0 0 8
Electroweak mass law 0 14 0 14
Continuous gravity phenomenology 0 32 0 32
CGM modal formal structure 0 0 6 6
Total 165 72 6 243

Cross-repo verification map

Manuscript Tier A overlap Tier B science scripts Tier C only
Analysis_aQPU_Wavefunction K4 gates (Part I) partially overlap aqpu_wavefunction_1.py, _2.py (T1-T10 exhaustive) none
Analysis_Gravity Physics/aQPU tests cover many kernel items aqpu_gravity_analysis_1-10.py, aqpu_gravity_common.py, aqpu_corrections_analysis_1.py App. A modal proofs (#235-239)
Analysis_Compact_Geometry Shell structure in aQPU SDK tests aqpu_compact_geom_kernel.py, _core.py, _report.py none

Run all gravity scripts and capture output:

python experiments/aqpu_gravity_runner.py
# writes experiments/aqpu_gravity_analysis.txt

What each tier definitively proves

Tier A (165 features). Superintelligence pytest establishes the Gyroscopic aQPU Kernel as an exactly solvable finite algebraic quantum system on standard silicon: 4096-state manifold, K4 gates, Hilbert lift to 10^-12, computational advantages, non-Clifford delta(BU), self-dual code, CGM constants bridge.

Tier B (72 features). Science repo executables extend verification to the three analysis manuscripts: wavefunction theorems T1-T10 on all Omega states, gravity kernel invariants (D=24, plaquette/Regge/tau_G), electroweak mass law to 6e-9 tick error, and continuous gravity phenomenology (PPN, shadow, TOV, GW) to numerical closure.

Tier C (6 features). Formal modal-logic results (independence of CS/UNA/ONA/BU, 3D necessity, SE(3) emergence) proved in manuscript [15], not wrapped as experiment scripts.


Last updated from superintelligence verification reports, analysis manuscripts, and science repo experiment script headers. This inventory does not re-run any suite.