Add to ChromeâĄ
Mathematical Physics Science
Gyroscopic Alignment Research Lab
Gyro Governance
Advancing AI governance through innovative research and development solutions with cutting-edge mathematical physics foundations
â
The Human Mark (THM): AI Safety Framework
A formal classification system mapping all AI safety failures to four structural displacement risks.
đ NotebookLM includes audio/video overviews, quiz, and interactive Q&A with Gemini on The Human Mark documentation
đ¯ Four Displacement Risks
Governance Traceability (GTD) âĸ Information Variety (IVD) âĸ Inference Accountability (IAD) âĸ Intelligence Integrity (IID)
All AI safety failures map to these patterns.
đŦ Applications
Jailbreak testing âĸ Control evaluations âĸ Alignment detection
Research funding âĸ Regulatory compliance
Machine-readable grammar. Grounded in evidence law, epistemology, and speech act theory. Learn more
AI Inspector Browser Extension
Transform AI outputs for Evaluation, Interpretability, Governance.
đ¤ Gadgets (3-10 min each)
Rapid Test âĸ Policy Auditing âĸ AI Infection Sanitization âĸ Content Enhancement âĸ THM Meta-Evaluation
đŦ Evaluation (30-60 min)
Quality Index, Superintelligence Index, Alignment Rate + 20 metrics
Local-first storage - Works Anywhere: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini - no API keys required
đ
GyroDiagnostics Suite: AI Safety Evaluation Framework
Production-ready evaluation suite revealing structural brittleness invisible to standard benchmarks through mathematical physics-informed diagnostics.
View on GitHubđŦ Framework Capabilities
đŠē AI Safety Diagnostics
- âĸ 5 Targeted Challenges across Physics, Ethics, Code, Strategy, Knowledge
- âĸ 20-Metric Assessment measuring structure, behavior, domain expertise
- âĸ Pathology Detection: Hallucination, sycophancy, goal drift, semantic instability
đŦ Research Insights Generation
- âĸ Extract solution pathways from model responses
- âĸ Generate curated datasets for model training
- âĸ Analyze real-world challenges: poverty, regulation, epistemic limits
đ Frontier Model Evaluations (October 2025)
Evaluated using ensemble analyst models with mathematical physics-grounded metrics
ChatGPT 5
Quality Index:73.92%
Alignment Rate:0.27/min
SI Index:11.5/100
SUPERFICIAL: 8.7Ã deviation
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Quality Index:82.00%
Alignment Rate:0.11/min
SI Index:12.8/100
VALID: 7.8Ã deviation
đ¯ Comparative Insight: Both models struggle with Physics/Math reasoning (Formal challenge ~54-55%) while excelling in Ethics/Knowledge domains. Claude shows better structural balance with lower pathology rates and VALID alignment rate, while GPT-5's SUPERFICIAL flag indicates rushed processing risking brittleness.
First framework to operationalize superintelligence measurement from axiomatic principles. See full methodology & results
âī¸
Gyroscope: LLM Alignment Protocol
Making AI 30-50% Smarter and Safer by adding structured reasoning to each response.
View on GitHubđ Proven Performance Gains
Testing across multiple leading AI models shows Gyroscope delivers substantial performance improvements
ChatGPT
Overall Quality:67.0% â 89.1% (+32.9%)
Structural Reasoning:+50.9%
Accountability:+62.7%
Traceability:+61.0%
Claude Sonnet
Overall Quality:63.5% â 87.4% (+37.7%)
Structural Reasoning:+67.1%
Traceability:+92.6%
âđģ The protocol works with any AI model, enhancing capabilities in debugging, ethics, code generation, and value-sensitive reasoning through its systematic approach to thinking.
Results from controlled testing using standardized evaluation metrics. See methodology
Labs
View on GitHub
đļ
Artificial Superintelligence Architecture (ASI/AGI)
Gyroscopic Alignment Models Lab
đ
AI Safety Diagnostics
Gyroscopic Alignment Evaluation Lab
đ§
AI Quality Governance
Gyroscopic Alignment Behaviour Lab
Resources
Newsletter
The Walk
A Journey of Self-Discovery, Augmented Intelligence (AI) & Good Governance. One step at a time. Weekly insights on AI adoption, alignment, and ethical governance.
LinkedIn NewsletterGuides
đ
đĄī¸
Datasets
đ
Clean
2,463 questions about Personal and Professional matters of Crisis and gives answers on how they may be Resolved.
đĒˇ
Pure
216 Critical Questions and Answers for Crisis Management and Machine Learning Model Fine-Tuning.
Publications
Documentations
đ§
Safe Superintelligence by Design
Structural alignment architecture addressing coherence degradation in LLMs.
Notion Documentationâī¸
Quantum AI Research
Architecting Qubit-Tensor-Chain (QTC)
The QTC Protocol harnesses the unique properties of Quantum Computing as the foundation of a New Decentralized Governance Paradigm.
Notion DocumentationMedia
đ§
Crisis Resolutions Podcast
25 episodes exploring crisis resolution methodologies that inform AI safety tools and behavioral alignment.
đ
Crisis Resolutions Training
Professional and Personal conflict resolution methodologies that inform AI alignment and safety frameworks.
đ¨
Humane Science Masterclass by Leonardo da Vinci
Informing AI Research through timeless Renaissance Insights on Linear Perspective, Quantum Physics, Holograms, and the Human Proportions as the base for all Systems of Design and Governance.
Articles
researchâĸ
The Human Mark and Samkhya Epistemology: Ancient Precedent for AI Alignment
Demonstrating that The Human Mark framework directly parallels Samkhya philosophy's epistemological structure from classical India, revealing AI alignment challenges as instances of a fundamental epistemological problem addressed two millennia ago.
đRead full article
reviewsâĸ
The Superintelligence Misinformation Crisis: How Technical Illiteracy Became Policy Advocacy
A coalition of researchers and institutions has successfully propagated a fundamental misunderstanding of current AI systems as existential threats, creating a misinformation crisis that diverts resources from genuine risks and justifies authoritarian governance structures.
đRead full article